Saturday, October 4, 2014

Getting to Know Your International Contacts-Part 2

IMG_4692.jpg

This past week I was only able to have a very brief yet informative conversation with Mar on Facebook messenger.  I informed her I had sent her an email earlier in the week and she apologized that she had been unable to respond. Mar stated they she has been busy since last Sunday because they have conducting examinations called Long Test at her school.  They give the Long Test at the end of the month every month.  I was very surprised when I asked even in her class for 4-5 year olds?  Now I realized that the standards that the US is attempting to move to other countries have been doing to their children as well to advance their academic skills. Early learning standards are really taking a vast amount of time and energy. “This is because most public systems are pairing their early learning standards with an accountability system that includes sanctions when children do not get to their destination by the end of a particular leg of the journey.  The pressure to get there is palpable” (Graue, 2008).  There are 4 subjects the children are tested on.  They have 3 long examinations for them as well each month.  I explained that early childhood professionals tend to be against standardized testing for our children at such a young age.  We feel it causes stress and takes away from a holistic child-centered curriculum.  Play is being taken out of the curriculum because of the stress of introducing academics.  Mar stated “in our curriculum, actually we don’t have play time every day.  Only during physical education class they can play.  Our kids are used to this type of curriculum” (Mar Live, Personal Communication, 2014).  “The curriculum is modeled on the AERO standards and a variety of US national and state standards in all subjects” (US Department of State, 2012, para. 2). When viewing the website for the school I learned that the school that Mar teaches at uses US standards yet there is a focus on the “Saudi Arabian culture, Arab culture and Arabic language” (US Department of State, 2012, para. 2). 

I found this statement interesting based on the differences that Mar has stated about what her classroom focuses on.  She teaches what I believe in kindergarten.  This is for the 3 year old classroom. “The program is play-based with lots of opportunities for children to interact with other children their age. The rooms are chock full of developmentally and educationally appropriate toys such as puzzles, puppets and building toys. Pre-K is a half day program. Our program is based on current research and best practices established by NAEYC (National Association for the Education of Young Children). Our program is designed to foster the individual and developmental needs of each child, paying attention to social, emotional, physical and cognitive needs and appreciating the unique experiences that each child brings from his or her home culture. Because children develop and different rates and learn in different ways, we provide a child-centered program that is developmentally appropriate” (The American School International School-Riyadh, nd, para. 1-2).  Although NAEYC accredited it is my assumption based on my conversation with Mar it is much more rigorous and academic focus.  It would have to be to prepare children for their transition to kindergarten and the academic testing that is conducted each month.  She stated the children are used to the curriculum.

Graue, E. (2008). Teaching and learning in a post-DAP world. Early Education & Development, 19(3), 441–447. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

US Department of State. (2012).  Saudi Arabia, Riyadh: American International School – Riyadh, Retrieved October 4, 2014, from http://www.state.gov/m/a/os/1517.htm       
        
The American International School Riyadh. (nd.).  Pre-Kindergarten.  Retrieved October 4, 2014, from http://www.aisr.org/es1/pre-k

4 comments:

  1. Thanks for sharing this with us as it's quite interesting. I'm just amazed that the 4-5 year old in Saudi Arabia are so mature to sit long enough to take a test. This just proves that the standards that other countries are using are much higher than ours here in America. I would love to know if these student's she has are gifted and talented? Most kids, even in kindergarten, can rarely recognized their name in written form, let alone, take a test. Quite interesting and keep sharing!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't know that I would say the standards are higher in other countries, merely more demanding. I think that expecting children that young to sit still for testing for a lengthy period is NOT developmentally appropriate. I also feel that sanctions when children do not meet particular goals are counter-productive. This conversation shows me that we are not the only country experiencing these issues in ECE.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I enjoyed your posted. I am amazed that the children are able to sit for along period of time at that age. I don't feel they are more advanced maybe more disciplined. I can imagine the pressure of the children achieve a passing grade a such an early age.

    ReplyDelete
  4. In my opinion, I still think testing majority of the school year is too much. Since school started at the end of August, I have given a math BOY benchmark, DIBELs test, weekly assessments, and now working on the KRA-Kindergarten Readiness Assessment. Each child is tested individually while your other students are participating in learning centers throughout the room. Each test can take between 15 minutes to one hour per child. Children can be disciplined to work independently, my kindergarten students are able to do it but I would prefer to teach and facilitate more and rely on authentic projects to monitor the achievement of skills being presented. It seems the nation is more worried about the data then the children. Data will not improve until quality teaching and appropriate assessments are evaluated.

    ReplyDelete